Blog

  • Consumer Credit Smashes All Estimates As Monthly Credit Card Debt Unexpectedly Surges By Most In 2 Years

    Consumer Credit Smashes All Estimates As Monthly Credit Card Debt Unexpectedly Surges By Most In 2 Years

    2025 closed with a surprising surge in consumer spending and retail sales, one which was unexpected since personal savings at the end of the year had just ground to a 3 year low

    … which when coupled with stagnant earnings prompted the question just where did consumers get the money for December’s spending spree. 

    We now have the answer: at 3pm today, the Fed published the latest consumer credit data, and boy was it a doozy. After November’s tepid $4.2 billion increase in total consumer credit (which came in below estimates even after today’s revision to $4.7 billion), consensus was looking for a modest bounce to $8 billion, or well below the post-covid average. Instead, what the Fed reported was a stunner: consumer credit soared by a whopping $24.045 billion, the biggest monthly increase of 2025 by a wide margin (only Dec. 2024 was bigger going back all the way to 2023),..

    … and not only was the number 3x higher than the median forecast, it came in above the highest economist forecast, in this case from RBC’s Michael Reid at $22.7 billion.

    The breakdown shows that while the increase in non-revolving credit, or auto and student loans, was a bit more than recent monthly prints at $10.2 or the highest since May ’25…

    … it was the surge in credit card debt (i.e. revolving credit) that was the big delta in the December numbers: at $13.8 billion, a huge jump from the $1.7 billion drop in November, this was the biggest monthly increase since 2023!

    In other words, the unexpectedly strong close to the end of the year was funded by the same old source: credit cards, and as in all previous credit card fueled surges, this one too will have to be repaid, pulling from future spending at some point, although it very well may not if credit card companies just tacitly approve some more dry powder and instead just bury the average American under even more debt. 

    As for student and auto loans, it was a surprisingly tame quarter because even though nonrevolving credit closed 2026 at a new record high of $3.780 trillion (with the two largest components student and car loans at $1.856 trillion and $1.562 trillion, respectively), the increase in the quarter was modest at best, up just $2.6 billion for student loans, and $0.8 billion for auto loans. What is remarkable is that auto loans actually declined in 2025 which may explain why the car industry has been so bad in 2025.

    Finally, and this will come as a surprise to nobody, despite 1.75% in rate cuts by the Fed since last September, we can now confirm that rates on credit cards have gone… nowhere as banks continue to bleed US consumers dry: at the middle of 2023 the average rate on credit card accounts was 22.16%… and on Dec 31, 2025 – and a half years years later, the number was higher at 22.30%, just barely below the all time high of 23.37% set one year ago. And all thise despite 6 rate cuts by the Fed. 

    One almost wonders: if it’s not the Fed setting rates on consumer credit, what’s the point of having a central banks?

    Loading recommendations…
  • January US Jobs Report Rescheduled For February 11

    January US Jobs Report Rescheduled For February 11

    The government reopened after another theatrical two-day shutdown, but that doesn’t mean that Friday’s payrolls report will come when it is due (after all, it’s not like the BLS had 30 days to prepare for it, oh wait, they did). Instead, the January employment report has been rescheduled for Wednesday, Feb. 11, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    The data, originally due Feb. 6, was delayed by the partial government shutdown. BLS announced the changes Wednesday, shortly after funding for a number of agencies, including the Labor Department, was restored.

    January’s consumer price index report, originally due Feb. 11, is now scheduled for Friday, Feb. 13, the BLS also said.

    Other BLS reports that were due this week, including December’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey and the Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment release, were also rescheduled.

    The partial shutdown ended late Tuesday after President Donald Trump signed into law a funding deal he negotiated with Senate Democrats. The Labor Department, and most other government agencies, are now funded through Sept. 30.

    In addition to the usual monthly payrolls and unemployment data, the January jobs report also includes highly anticipated revisions to annual employment. Those are expected to show that job growth was notably weaker in the year through March 2025 than initially reported.

    Loading recommendations…
  • No Global Recession In 2026, But Period Of Poor Growth Continues

    No Global Recession In 2026, But Period Of Poor Growth Continues

    Authored by Daniel Lacalle,

    The IMF estimates for 2026 show no signs of recession. However, the global economy remains in a period of poor growth, high debt, persistent inflation and low productivity.

    There may not be a recession, but citizens feel poorer as net real wages decline in most economies, remaining below pre-pandemic levels. Why? Because in most developed economies, GDP growth is bloated by government spending, which means high debt, followed by rising taxes that hurt investment and productivity.

    The IMF has had to revise its United States estimates to more than double what they expected in early 2025, while Argentina clearly outperforms both the global and regional averages.

    Global GDP growth is projected at 3.3% in 2026 and 3.2% in 2027, slightly above the October 2025 projections and broadly in line with 2025 levels.

    US outperforms advanced economies

    The positive surprise is the United States. Advanced economies are expected to grow by about 1.8% in 2026 and 1.7% in 2027 thanks to higher US figures, while emerging markets and developing economies reach around 4.2% and 4.1%, respectively, despite a slowdown in China.

    The IMF calls this “resilient growth” after a year of warning about risks. This is surprising, because many analysts point out that we should be worried when the IMF starts giving bullish messages.

    Despite the ironic comments, the IMF does warn about the poor levels of economic development in the leading economies.

    The main drivers of economic strength come from AI‑related investment, accommodative financial conditions and private sector flexibility, which offset the negative impact of geopolitical risk and trade negotiations.

    The US will be the only G7 economy escaping stagnation in 2025-2027

    The Fund was clearly wrong about its estimates for the US economy published last year.

    It now projects US growth at 2.4% in 2026, another relevant upward revision from its October 2025 forecast, considering stronger‑than‑expected 2025 data and a powerful impulse from AI‑related capital spending (data centres, chips, digital infrastructure).

    For 2027, US growth is expected to moderate to about 2.0%, still above the advanced‑economy average.

    The US will be the only G7 economy escaping stagnation in 2025-2027 and outperforming all its major peers with lower immigration, lower taxes and a reduction in government spending, while the major peers, Germany, Japan, France, UK and Canada, continue to disguise the private sector recession with more public spending and rising immigration.

    The IMF has not admitted its mistake in assuming stagnation and elevated inflation due to tariffs and prefers to explain the massive upgrades justifying them on lower policy rates, ongoing fiscal support, and high-tech investment.

    It is not important. The reality is that the US has proven wrong all the fearmongers and doom predictors and has turned into one of the main drivers of global demand in this forecast round.

    Argentina: growth above global and regional averages

    The IMF expects Argentina to grow by around 4% in both 2026 and 2027, clearly above the 3.3% world pace and significantly ahead of Latin America’s projected 2.2% in 2026 and 2.7% in 2027.

    This comes after an estimated 4.5% expansion in 2025, following a 1.3% contraction in 2024. The International Monetary Fund explicitly links this impressive trajectory to the policies of President Milei and recent macro‑stabilisation efforts.

    Argentina moves from chronic underperformer to clear outperformer in the IMF’s baseline

    Argentina moves from chronic underperformer to clear outperformer in the IMF’s baseline, especially with a weak outlook for Mexico and Brazil.

    Supply-side policies, private sector focus and abandoning interventionism in energy are among the factors that put a faster‑growing US and Argentina as the “pockets of strength” that allow global growth to stay around 3.3% despite the euro area and LatAm stagnation.

    Low growth in Europe

    For the euro area, the IMF shows moderate but gradually improving growth. However, most of it comes from Germany’s increasing debt.

    Real GDP is projected to expand by 1.3% in 2026 and 1.4% in 2027, a slight upward revision versus the October 2025 outlook and consistent with the ECB’s own projections.

    However, we cannot forget that this disastrous economic growth comes in the middle of the Next Generation EU stimulus plan and with rate cuts.

    Germany is expected to recover from near‑stagnation towards 1.1% in 2026 and 1.5% in 2027 only due to a more than debatable public spending and indebtedness programme.

    France is expected to show no real growth by about 1.0% and 1.2%, driven by government spending.

    The IMF’s message is that, compared with the United States, the euro area remains a low‑growth region, constrained by weak productivity and excessive regulation and taxes.

    For the United Kingdom, the Fund keeps an optimistic forecast at 1.3% growth in 2026 and 1.5% in 2027. It is said that, after the US, the UK and Canada are the fastest‑growing G7 economies.

    This reminds us that net zero, high taxes and big government are the recipe for stagnation.

    Canada is projected to expand by just 1.4% per year in 2026 and 2027. Japan will only show 0.7% growth in 2026 and 0.6% in 2027, according to the IMF, despite years of government spending on so-called stimulus.

    In Asia, the IMF focuses its attention on the Chinese slowdown, offset by the strength in India.

    China is projected to grow by 4.5% in 2026 and 4.0% in 2027, slower than its 5% growth in 2025. However, it is still one of the main engines of global expansion, despite the ongoing challenges facing the real estate sector.

    India remains the fastest‑growing large economy in the IMF’s outlook, with growth around the 6% range in both 2026 and 2027, driven by domestic demand. India is, according to the IMF, the high beta growth story in Asia.

    The IMF should recover economic sanity recommendations and remind governments that supply-side and market-oriented economies focused on strengthening the private sector are the drivers that the global economy requires, and that constant public sector expansion hinders growth and creates financial weakness.

    We may not have a recession, but weakness in developed and emerging economies is unjustified, and the main culprit is government interventionism.

    Loading recommendations…
  • US Services Sector Surveys Signal Solid Growth In January, But…

    US Services Sector Surveys Signal Solid Growth In January, But…

    Following the dramatic rebound in US Manufacturing survey data – driven by a surge in new orders – ‘Soft’ data has bounced back dramatically from its post-government shutdown lows (which is ironically occurring as the hard data – which was so resilient through the shutdown – has started to roll over)…

    …and this morning’s Services Sector survey data builds on that rebound

    • S&P Global’s US Services PMI signaled a better than expected expansion of 52.7 in January (52.5 exp), rebounding from April 2025 lows.

    • ISM’s US Services PMI survey also beat expectations in January (53.8 vs 53.5 exp), but was flat from a revised lower 53.8.

    But both still solidly in expansion…

    The S&P Global US Composite PMI recorded 53.0 in January. That was up from 52.7 in December and represented a solid rate of growth in private sector activity. Both sectors covered by the survey recorded stronger output expansions, in line with faster gains in new business. Employment meanwhile rose only marginally, while confidence in the outlook softened.

    Despite the rebound, US has been overtaken by UK and Japan in terms of global PMIs…

    “Sustained service sector growth, supported by a robust rise in manufacturing output in January, indicates the economy is growing at an annualized rate of around 1.7%,” according to Chris Williamson, Chief Business Economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence.

    However, that is a lower gear compared to the pace of expansion seen prior to December’s slowdown, and hints at GDP growth cooling in the first quarter.

    Consumer-facing companies are increasingly reporting a challenging environment, with demand for services falling in January having nearly stalled in December, “reflecting low levels of consumer sentiment and cost of living pressures,” Williamson noted.

    The ISM data showed a triple whammy of higher prices, lower new orders, and lower employment…

    However, as Williamson concludes, “inflationary pressures in the service sector meanwhile remain elevated, blamed on the pass though of tariff related price increases and wage growth, though stiff competition is often reported to have limited the impact on final selling prices.”

    “While financial and business service providers are reporting a more resilient picture, demand growth here is also showing signs of fraying amid heightened concerns over the economic outlook, in turn often blamed on political uncertainty.

    However, there is a silver lining, as Williamson concludes: “lower interest rates and favorable financial conditions, higher government spending, combined with more active sales and marketing efforts, are propping up business sentiment and spending, and also encouraging modest hiring.”

    Loading recommendations…
  • California Plans “Mileage Tax” To Bleed Citizens For Even More Cash

    California Plans “Mileage Tax” To Bleed Citizens For Even More Cash

    Lawmakers in the California State Assembly have moved to direct the Transportation Commission to prepare a study on the effects of a road charge for delivery to the legislature.  A road charge is a program that imposes fees based on the number of miles each citizen drives over a specified period, and is designed to offset gas tax losses from the wider use of electric cars on California roads. 

    In 2014, California passed Senate Bill 1077, authorizing a “Road Usage Charge Technical Advisory Committee” to explore whether the state could replace its gas tax with a mileage-driven tax.  The project was based on the assumption that “cleaner vehicles” and a potential zero-emission future would lead to dwindling gas tax revenues. 

    The state has been running road charge pilot programs since 2016. Last year, a pilot project concluded where mileage rates were set at 2.5 cents per mile for light-duty vehicles, such as cars, and other vehicles weighing less than 10,000 pounds. The rate for heavy-duty vehicles is dependent on their weight.

    Today, proponents complain that implementation is not going fast enough.  The latest bill is being called an “extension” of the pilot project and not a move to pass the actual tax.   Democrats assert that Republicans are interfering with the project and misrepresenting its intent.  However, taxes based on climate ideology are often kept on the shelf by exploratory committees, waiting for politically opportune moments to pass them quickly with minimal public opposition or debate.  The Democrats are simply biding their time.

    It is not clear yet when the mileage tax will be made official or if it will replace the gas tax; it is far more likely that both taxes would ultimately exist in tandem.  Republicans argue that the tax is unfair to residents of rural counties where driving distances are much greater and gas vehicles are common.  The tax is useful, though, for climate “re-wilding”:  The globalist idea of forcing people to abandon rural areas and move into population centers so that large swaths of the nation can be “returned to nature.”   

    California currently has the highest gas taxes in the country.  Total state taxes and environmental fees frequently exceeding .90 cents per gallon, contributing significantly to the nation’s highest pump prices ($4.30 per gallon compared to a national average of $2.87). 

    Over the past few years Governor Gavin Newsom and Democrats have sought to deflect blame for the state’s exorbitant fuel costs by accusing oil companies of “price gouging” consumers; a claim which was ultimately proven false the government’s own investigations. State interference has led to multiple refinery closures and the loss of numerous small business gas stations; prices are expected to rise even further.  

    The relentless (and baseless) hostility towards the oil industry in liberal states is forcing citizens into electric vehicles, but officials have no intention of letting the public escape taxation.  The concept goes well beyond the old school idea of toll roads.  A charge for mileage could require intrusive surveillance technology, including “black box” GPS devices in every vehicle to track miles driven.  Or, yearly inspections of odometers with arduous paperwork and bureaucratic red tape. 

    If they can’t tax the gas, they will tax residents simply for driving.  Next comes a tax simply for breathing.          

    Loading recommendations…
  • This Weeks Jobs, JOLTS Reports To Be Delayed Due To Govt Shutdown

    This Weeks Jobs, JOLTS Reports To Be Delayed Due To Govt Shutdown

    Here we go again.

    The government shutdown, which should be lifted in 24-48 hours once the House votes (we reported yesterday that Mike Johnson allegedly has the votes to pass the vote), is again jamming the machinery of government data reporting. 

    The BLS has pushed back the January 2026 jobs report, originally set for Feb 6, along with December’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey and Metropolitan Area Employment data.

    “The release will be rescheduled upon the resumption of government funding,” Emily Liddel, an associate commissioner at BLS, said in a statement. “Due to the partial federal government shutdown, the Bureau of Labor Statistics will suspend data collection, processing, and dissemination.”

    The Bureau of Labor Statistics will announce new release dates once funding is restored.

    Loading recommendations…
  • Huge Surge In New Orders Sends US Manufacturing Activity Near 4 Year Highs

    Huge Surge In New Orders Sends US Manufacturing Activity Near 4 Year Highs

    With ‘hard’ data sustaining signs of solid growth (e.g. factory orders and jobless claims), ‘soft’ survey data has been bouncing back since the start of the year

    This morning we get the final Manufacturing PMI data from S&P Global and ISM for January.

    A solid and stronger improvement in US manufacturing sector operating conditions (52.4 vs 52.0 exp) was signaled by January’s S&P Global PMI data amid the joint-sharpest upturn in production since May 2022.

    However, growth was in part driven by inventory building as new orders, despite returning to expansion in January, increased only modestly.

    ISM’s Manufacturing was expected to rise from 47.9 to 48.5 in January but instead it soared to 52.6 – its highest since Aug 2022. This is the first print above 50 since January 2025.

    Source: Bloomberg

    This was the biggest MoM surge in the ISM print since April 2020 (COVID rebound), led by a huge surge in new orders and rise in employment (highest in a year) and prices (though elevated) are stable…

    “News of the joint largest rise in factory production since May 2022 is tainted by reports of ongoing subdued sales growth,” says Chris Williamson, Chief Business Economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence.

    “Production growth consequently significantly outpaced that of new orders at the start of the year, resulting in a further accumulation of unsold warehouse inventory.”

    Over the past three months, the survey indicates that factories have typically produced more goods than they have sold to a degree we have not previously seen since the global financial crisis back in early 2009.”

    This highly unusual situation is clearly unsustainable, hinting at risks of a production slowdown and a potential knock-on effect on employment, unless demand improves markedly in the coming months.

    Williamson adds that “sluggish sales and order book growth are being commonly linked to customer resistance to high prices, in turn often blamed on tariffs, as well as increased uncertainty over the economic outlook.”

    While just below trend, business growth expectations for the year ahead are, however, holding up as firms anticipate improving demand, “thanks in part to lower interest rates, reduced import competition due to tariffs, and more government support.”

    However, as Williamson concludes, “political uncertainty remains a key drag on business sentiment.”

    Loading recommendations…
  • Bifurcation Nation & The TINA Economy’s Freefall

    Bifurcation Nation & The TINA Economy’s Freefall

    Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via Substack,

    The term “The K-Shaped Economy” has entered the lexicon to describe the divergence of the top tier of earners and owners of capital from the lower tiers, as the trajectory of the first is up and that of the second is down.

    While the “The K-Shaped Economy” offers visual clarity, it’s ultimately an abstraction. Longtime correspondent Harvey D. recently offered a more accurate term, The Bifurcation Economy, which describes (as he put it) the reality that 50 miles outside major US cities, the precarity and quality of life is Third World. I modified his term to Bifurcation Nation, to express that the widening divide isn’t just financial, it describes everything from healthcare to social / political power.

    I’ve assembled a few charts to illustrate the range of this Bifurcation between the top tier and the rest.

    Here is the S&P 500 (SPX) stock market index, representing the wealth of corporations and the top 10% who own their shares, rising at a 45-degree angle, and consumer sentiment, representing the real-world economy, sliding down a 45-degree angle.

    Here is employment hiring by large corporations–up–and small business employment–down.

    Here is the share of income going to the top 10%–up (for illustrative purposes, not to scale)–and the share going to the bottom 90%: down.

    As the total financial wealth of US households has soared, the share owned by the bottom 50% has fallen by 28.6% since 1990 while the share owned by the top 1% has risen 42%. As the pie got bigger, the percentage going to the top 1% got bigger, too. The rising tide didn’t raise all boats equally, it widened the gap between the top 1% and the rest.

    Here is the share of consumer spending of the top 20%–up–and the bottom 80%–down.

    One causal force that receives little attention is what I’m calling “The TINA Economy”: there is no alternative when it comes to paying higher prices for essentials and taxes, and so the share of income left to spend on what’s still a choice shrinks.

    Everything that is necessary to participate in the economy at a level above abject poverty is concentrated in monopolies and cartels who use their control of production, supply chain and the politically geared regulatory structure to set what’s available on the market and what isn’t, and to raise prices and degrade quality and quantity to increase profits not by offering competitive advantages but by TINA coercion.

    As the essentials go up in price, the sum of household income left to spend elsewhere (discretionary income) declines. The sectors of the economy that depend on discretionary spending are the only parts of the economy with any real competition: dining out, entertainment, leisure and travel, aspirational / status-enhancing spending, etc.

    Many of these sectors are dominated by a handful of corporations: pizza chains, travel sites, airlines, short-term vacation rentals, rideshare services, hotels and resorts, and so on.

    The sectors of the economy that aren’t yet dominated by cartels and quasi-monopolies–the small businesses that depend on discretionary spending–are the bricks and mortar enterprises that give towns, neighborhoods and cities their character and desirable quality of life.

    As discretionary income is squeezed by relentless increases in rent, healthcare, auto and home insurance, food, childcare, vehicle repairs, subscriptions for digital services and software, all required to earn a living and maintain an abode better than a cardboard box on the sidewalk, there is less income available to spend on non-essentials, which are generally provided by local small businesses.

    Households that have maintained discretionary spending by borrowing money are being eaten alive by rising debt service--the interest and principal due on credit cards, auto loans, student loans, installment payments, etc. Eventually their discretionary income is consumed by debt service.

    Small businesses have shared interests, but they’re diffuse and distributed over numerous sectors and physical locations. There is no way they can match the billions of dollars a corporation can devote to lobbying, campaign contributions, PR campaigns, etc. Small businesses don’t have the advantages of scale, or the ability to leverage their market power to get better deals on taxes, rent and other expenses.

    A corporate pizza chain, for example, can draw upon corporate deep pockets to offer discounts that no local pizza shop can match. So the local pizza shops all close and the residents are left with a choice of corporate pizza outlets–ultimately not much of a choice at all.

    Left unsaid in the corporate/financial media’s coverage of the K-Shaped Economy is what happens to towns, neighborhoods and cities when shrinking discretionary income and soaring costs sink the bricks and mortar small businesses, leaving only sanitized, homogenized corporate outposts: the empty storefronts gut the local economy and strip the character from everything that was once unique or interesting.

    Corporate coffee shop, empty storefronts, corporate pizza shop, empty storefronts, and a new luxury apartment complex developed and owned by corporations with zero interest in the locale other than harvesting soaring rents and then selling the property to global investors.

    Left unsaid is the interest of monopolies and cartels begins and ends with extracting the maximum possible from all who have no alternative in an economy in which a handful of corporations control the majority of essentials, from healthcare insurance to banking to beef distribution to digital services. As for government, regardless of who you vote for, property taxes and fees go up.

    Monopolies and cartels have zero interest in the quality of our lives; they only care about friction that reduces their net income and obstacles to their expanding extraction. They have no interest in how the bottom 90% are faring, and only marginal interest in the top 10% who generate 50% of consumer spending.

    This is the problem with financializing an economy and society: the logic of maximizing profits by any means available inevitably leads to capital corrupting politics to protect monopolies and cartels, as these are the ideal platforms for maximizing extraction / coercion and thus profits.

    In a financialized economy, there is no alternative to the eventual domination of monopolies and cartels, because in the logic of financialization, these are the only logical outcomes.

    The quality of life in the TINA Economy is one of erosion, as the foundations of a high quality of life are hollowed out, either homogenized and commoditized (what I call Ultra-Processed Life) or left to decay.

    Note that this decay is in a “booming economy” of soaring corporate profits and rising GDP. When the inevitable recession slashes profits, spending, employment and income, the small businesses struggling to survive in the competitive discretionary sectors will slide into oblivion, as the costs of essentials will continue rising while their revenues collapse.

    Discretionary spending is now dependent on the top 10% drawing on the temporary wealth of credit-asset bubbles. Once these bubbles pop (and all bubbles pop), the top 10% spending will collapse along with the bubble’s phantom wealth.

    Corporate monopolies and cartels won’t care until their corralled customers stop paying en masse. But then it will be too late to change the outcome. The same can be said of local governments that can’t print / borrow money to sustain their spending: as tax revenues plummet, there will be no way to reverse the endgame.

    The endgame of a fully financialized, coercive TINA economy and society is Bifurcation Nation stumbling into the abyss of Depression with an economic profession and leadership class that are themselves homogenized and commoditized, unable to recognize Model Collapse, much less admit their failure, which is the first step in successful adaptation.

    Loading recommendations…
  • Germany’s PMI “Recovery” Is Built On Layoffs, Price Inflation, And State Expansion

    Germany’s PMI “Recovery” Is Built On Layoffs, Price Inflation, And State Expansion

    Submitted by Thomas Kolbe

    Economic indicators suggest a stabilization in Germany’s services sector. Yet the apparent improvement in the corresponding index follows massive staff reductions and efficiency measures undertaken by companies responding to a political structural crisis.

    In Berlin, the great tremor has begun. For almost exactly seven months now, the German economy has been pregnant with the federal government’s oversized debt package—and from an economic standpoint, it has delivered nothing so far. No growth in sight. Disappointment is spreading through the government quarter.

    Any attempt to explain to politicians that artificial state demand creates no real value but merely beautifies GDP statistics would likely be pearls before swine. And yet Chancellor Friedrich Merz and his cabinet are hoping for positive economic headlines to somehow stumble across the finish line of the 2026 super-election year.

    A Flicker of Hope

    As if an early success story had been ordered at the push of a button, the HCOB Services PMI (Purchasing Managers’ Index) reported an increase in January from 52.7 to 53.3 points—a three-month high.

    A figure that fuels false hopes in Berlin. Because what lies beneath the data is almost precisely the opposite of what would now be urgently required: Germany’s services sector is cleaning up its balance sheets, shedding staff on a massive scale in order to realize short-term efficiency gains. What we are witnessing is the forced reaction of the economy to ever-rising energy costs and higher input prices, which—made visible through the inflation index—are passed on to customers and artificially inflate the headline figures. Adjusted for prices, the downturn continues.

    Meanwhile, the countless new regulations raining down on the economy from Brussels and Berlin ensure that this diagnosis will not change. A whole bundle of new emissions rules, border adjustment mechanisms, data-usage standards, and countless other ideas from the EU’s industrious bureaucratic think tanks are making life even harder for companies—presumably the much-praised “debureaucratization” that Friedrich Merz keeps fantasizing about.

    Let us consider another data point that highlights the depth of Germany’s economic crisis. Current figures from the hospitality sector show that more than 97,000 applicants are now competing for just 19,000 open positions.

    Last year, the sector lost roughly four percent of its real business volume, and layoffs are now following the sharp downturn. The hospitality industry crystallizes the collapse of German purchasing power, as households—after years of inflation and a deteriorating labor market—are forced to tighten their belts.

    It cannot be emphasized often enough: the long-cultivated narrative of a German “skilled labor shortage,” promoted by politics and the media for years, was from the outset a political vehicle to flank open-border policies. Genuine skill shortages are addressed by companies through the international labor market—by the private sector, not through state-driven mass immigration into Germany’s welfare system. The political left has made the expansion of its voter base a strategic objective, and no reversal in migration policy is in sight.

    Here, at the economic front line of the domestic economy, political deception is laid bare. Unemployment will become an economic reality in the coming years, and it will place a heavy burden on social life in Germany.

    The State Creates a Buffer

    Meanwhile, the inevitable is unfolding in the economy: companies are cutting staff and raising prices wherever possible, making overall economic indicators appear more positive than they truly are—without any real new demand emerging. At the same time, selected firms benefit from state-subsidized projects in areas such as climate policy or military production, further reinforcing the illusion of expansion.

    The index figures obscure another crucial aspect of the labor-market debate. Last year, official unemployment in Germany rose by just over 100,000 people. This figure masks the reality that many workers were shifted into short-time work, the number of pensioners increased, and—contrary to the government’s political folklore—the state continued to systematically expand the public sector.

    Over the past five years, the number of public employees has grown annually between 1.8 and 2.6 percent. Over the past decade, nearly one million new state employees have been added. Today, five and a half million people work in Germany’s public sector—a bloated machine of capital destruction.

    Projecting this continuous expansion forward into 2025, the number of public employees will likely have increased by another 100,000. This is all the more plausible given that distributing the massive new debt package of more than €50 billion per year from the special fund requires a vast regional bureaucracy that far exceeds existing personnel capacities.

    Through the costly expansion of its administrative apparatus, the state is masking rising unemployment—a consequence of regulatory policy and the energy crisis that can no longer be concealed—and has driven the German economy into progressive deindustrialization.

    The Source of Prosperity

    Germany’s economic policy debate lacks substance. It must be emphasized far more clearly that prosperity is exclusively the product of private investment and cannot be conjured up on the drafting tables of central planners in Berlin and Brussels. Only private investment, guided by free markets and consumer demand, expands an economy’s productive capacity.

    The “special fund,” the largest state debt program in the history of the Federal Republic, is causing massive crowding-out effects in capital markets. Scarce resources are locked into subsidy schemes, free capital retreats, labor is tied up in unproductive sectors—and the state, in its desperation, fuels the general decline.

    These trends are well documented. Figures from the ifo Institute in November show that the investment expectations index fell to −9.2 points. This means a growing number of companies plan to sharply reduce investment this year—especially in industry, where the long-observed trend of capital withdrawal continues. The situation is particularly dramatic in automotive manufacturing, where the index plunged to −36.7 points.

    The chemical industry is also fighting for survival. With capacity utilization of only 70 percent, most energy-intensive firms are operating deep in the red. We are facing an economic depression that has manifested itself since 2018 in Germany’s declining industrial output. Overall corporate investment last year was around seven percent below the previous year’s level. Since 2018, German industry has lost more than 15 percent of its production volume.

    The country is growing poorer—while poverty migration into the welfare system continues unabated. On a per-capita basis, the effect is even clearer. Germany’s enormous redistribution machine is attempting to conceal the emerging social conflict by intensifying its raid on the middle class through ever more aggressive taxation.

    Germany reached its tipping point in 2018. Since then, the economy has stagnated, and overall productivity has declined—a clear indicator that the scaled-up interventionism of the state is crowding out investment capital while expanding a parasitic public sector.

    This is a dramatic finding with regard to technological progress, which should have led to massive productivity gains but cannot materialize in Germany amid the flight of companies and capital.

    Germany is heading toward growing distributional conflicts. Rising deficits in the social-security system are harbingers of an internal social storm that will unfold along ethnic and cultural lines.

    That the state is now rapidly deploying a censorship apparatus to suppress debate about the consequences of these policies should deeply concern everyone. The hastily formulated thesis that “the crisis is the solution” cannot solve individual financial problems, nor can it alleviate fears about personal safety in a country of concrete barriers and knife-free zones.

    The collapse of the welfare state shifts economic responsibility and social security back onto individuals. Recovery is possible. It begins when the state is no longer seen as the savior, but as the cause of the present crisis. Until then, the road ahead will be long and rocky.

    * * * 

    About the author: Thomas Kolbe, a German graduate economist, has worked for over 25 years as a journalist and media producer for clients from various industries and business associations. As a publicist, he focuses on economic processes and observes geopolitical events from the perspective of the capital markets. His publications follow a philosophy that focuses on the individual and their right to self-determination.

    Loading recommendations…
  • Decline Rewritten: The Changing Face Of American Shopping Malls

    Decline Rewritten: The Changing Face Of American Shopping Malls

    Authored by Panos Mourdoukoutas via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

    Shopping malls, long an economic and cultural fixture of American life, are facing sustained pressure but are not disappearing altogether.

    A sign at the Mall of America is pictured in Bloomington, Minn., on Feb. 2, 2006. Karen Bleier/AFP via Getty Images

    Instead, the sector is undergoing creative destruction, as traditional mall formats give way to new concepts that reflect shifting consumer behavior and market conditions, according to recent industry data.

    A research report by Capital One Shopping (COS) outlines the magnitude of the challenge facing the mall sector, citing rising mall closures that remain vacant for an average of nearly four years, as well as vacancy rates that are 112 percent higher than the overall retail vacancy rate.

    COS also estimates that as many as 87 percent of large shopping malls could close over the next decade.

    Adaptation Over Terminal Decline

    At the same time, COS data indicate a reversal of earlier trends. From 2021 through 2025, mall openings exceeded mall closures, suggesting adaptation rather than terminal decline. In 2025 alone, 9,410 new mall stores opened, nearly double the number that closed.

    Additional evidence of revival appears in a recent article published by Growth Factor. Author Clyde Christian Anderson reported that indoor mall foot traffic in March 2024 rose 9.7 percent year over year, open-air shopping center traffic increased 10.1 percent, and outlet mall traffic climbed 10.7 percent—each exceeding pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels.

    “The numbers don’t lie. After years of decline, shopping malls are experiencing their strongest performance since before the pandemic. This isn’t some temporary holiday bump or seasonal fluke. We’re looking at sustained growth that’s reshaping how we think about physical retail spaces,” Anderson wrote.

    Anderson also noted a structural shift in traffic patterns between 2019 and 2022, with increased weekday visits reflecting changes in work habits and consumer routines.

    “The data tells a compelling story of adaptation rather than decline. Malls are evolving into experiential destinations that blend shopping, dining, entertainment, and community spaces. The rise of work-from-home culture has shifted traffic patterns, with more visitors arriving during weekdays and earlier in the day,” he said.

    A Key Feature

    Retail expert Amrita Bhasin points to one feature that drives traffic to shopping malls and retail centers: private clubs.

    “Private clubs typically appeal to younger people seeking opportunities to socialize and dine in person,” she told The Epoch Times.

    By bringing them to a mall, these people have to pass by stores and may be more likely to shop as a result. Young people are especially interested in wellness, fitness, and health-related private clubs, as this is a growing trend.”

    According to research from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, the origins of the American shopping mall date back to 1907, when Baltimore’s Roland Park Business Block introduced a small cluster of shops in a planned suburban setting.

    By the 1930s, malls expanded to include multiple stores under one roof and ample parking, becoming convenient destinations for suburban consumers.

    The model gained momentum in the 1950s and 1960s, as department stores and restaurant chains joined mall developments, turning them into central commercial and social hubs.

    Early examples include Southdale Center in Edina, Minnesota; Big Town Mall in Glen Burnie, Maryland; and Randhurst Center in Mount Prospect, Illinois.

    As malls multiplied, competition intensified, and profit margins narrowed, pushing weaker retailers out. The situation deteriorated further during the stagflation of the early 1980s and accelerated with the rise of eCommerce in the early 2000s, as online retailers increasingly displaced brick-and-mortar stores.

    The Great Recession of 2008–2009 and the COVID-19 pandemic marked a turning point, triggering widespread department store closures that reduced mall traffic and forced many properties to shut down. Some malls never reopened, while others were converted into warehouses or logistics hubs, leaving only about one-third still operating as retail centers.

    An Evolving Concept

    The mall concept continues to evolve, as outlined by the Tourism and Society Think Tank, which describes a broad transformation driven by eCommerce, changing consumer preferences, and declining department store appeal.

    “The traditional image of shopping malls in the United States, a symbol of the boom in mass consumption in the twentieth century, is undergoing a profound transformation that is redefining their role in both the economy and community life,” it said.

    This shift—driven by structural forces such as the rise of eCommerce, changing consumer habits, and the declining appeal of department stores—is giving rise to new models that seek to ensure the viability of these spaces in an increasingly competitive, technology-driven environment.”

    Redevelopment projects illustrate this shift. Burnsville Center in Minnesota is adding a skate park, an Asian-themed food hall, and a small zoo, while Lakeside Mall in Sterling Heights, Michigan, is being redeveloped into Lakeside Town Center, a mixed-use destination with residences, offices, parks, restaurants, and retail.

    “Malls aren’t back across the board, but the best located ones are showing evidence of a strong and durable rebound while weaker ones are being remade,” Ilir Salihi, founder and senior editor of IncomeInsider.com, told The Epoch Times.

    Salihi cited rising traffic and occupancy rates in 2025, with some top mall owners reporting occupancy near 96 percent and higher sales per square foot. He pointed to Boise Towne Square, which posted 12.2 percent year-over-year growth after adding a high-traffic anchor tenant, generating a halo effect that attracted new retailers.

    Top-tier malls in strong locations are reinventing themselves, while many mid-market indoor malls are being repurposed entirely,” Salihi said.

    “In places like Maryland, Lakeforest Mall has been approved for demolition and redevelopment into a mixed-use ‘mini city.’ Others are being replaced by grocery stores or apartment buildings. The result is a reshaped mall landscape rather than a uniform comeback.”

    Loading recommendations…